Commentary: Tennessee Needs to Stop Supporting China-Linked Microvast

In this op-ed, EFTC Executive Director Bret Manley argues that Tennessee should end state incentives for Microvast’s battery plant in Clarksville, Tennessee, given significant ties to China, and national security and human rights concerns.


Microvast Holdings, Inc. has long derived most of its revenue and assets from operations in China, previously raising $400 million in funding from state-run CITIC Securities and Chinese private equity firm CDH Investments, which holds roughly 11% through affiliated entities, with board representation. While Microvast maintains a U.S. headquarters and public listing, its supply chains and core production remain heavily dependent on China, with almost all its manufacturing capacity, a 75,000 square foot R&D center and four subsidiaries in China. These connections raise legitimate questions under evolving U.S. policy aimed at strengthening national security by reducing reliance on adversarial supply chains.

If Microvast wishes to continue operating in Tennessee and benefiting from state economic support, it should be required to transition its Clarksville operations into independent American ownership and divest its Chinese assets. Anything short of this would amount to cosmetic reform. Tennessee should not be subsidizing companies like Microvast while claiming to strengthen American manufacturing.